Total non-game, unless of course you're comparing your score against others. I usually classify score based games as Challenge games, where the idea is to achieve a goal then to try and beat it. For instance playing golf vs someone is a game but playing golf on your own is just practice. I'm sticking by the win-lose situation.

[ Top of Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Search ] [ Return to the Forum ]

Posted by Darius on July 18, 2008 at 15:33:22 EST in reply to What about a game with a competitive goal and even scoring based on that competition, but no ultimate winning or losing? A game that just goes on for as long as you want and you judge whether you feel like you're winning or losing based on how well you're meeting your own self-imposed standards? Would that be a game or non-game? (n/t) from Sweater Fish Deluxe.

Total non-game, unless of course you're comparing your score against others. I usually classify score based games as Challenge games, where the idea is to achieve a goal then to try and beat it. For instance playing golf vs someone is a game but playing golf on your own is just practice. I'm sticking by the win-lose situation.

n/t

Follow Ups:

Well, the score can be compared to someone else's score (or to previous scores of your own) if you want to, of course. Still non-game? How about a situation (I almost said "game") where you can only lose? There's no winning, the best you can hope for is to survive for longer before inevitably losing. Game or non-game?

(Sweater Fish Deluxe)

(18:27:55 07/18/08 EST)

That would be Pac Man, and yeah that's a game.

(SignOfZeta)

(02:02:34 07/20/08 EST)

yah, any looping game from the 'golden age' of arcades counts there.

(exodus)

(02:55:22 07/20/08 EST)

So then there has to be a "game over" in order for it to be a game? Is that what we're going with? What if "game over" can only come after, say, seven years of uninterrupted play?

(Sweater Fish Deluxe)